AI Peer Review

Better reviews, better science. Calibrated, citation-grounded reviews with humans in the loop, kept yours to edit, share, and publish.

In this work, we model the risk of hospitalization for a large number of drug-disease combinations. Our methodology is akin to genome-wide association studies (GWAS), in which a simple model is used to estimate the effect of a large number of loci in a hypothesis-free manner. As in GWAS, this screen risks spurious relationships and requires further analysis, but complements target-driven repurposing.

observationIntroduction, p.2

The GWAS analogy is one of the clearest framings in the paper. It belongs in the abstract. A short sentence on the broad enumeration step and the multiplicity correction does enough to place the work as a screen, not another pair-specific observational study.

Humans in the loop

Our reviews update with your comments. Iterate together until the review completely reflects your read.

EvaluateAnnotateRecommend

Consistent, benchmarked, multi-faceted scores

Publications are graded based on multiple aspects, including the novelty of the work, the quality of the presentation, and experimental rigor.

1,971 graded papers
066.1Median100

Research intelligence

We evaluate thousands of publications every week.
See our reports on

Some of this week's best preprints

More on rankings
Jiuming Liu et al.Computer Vision
Seokjin Go et al.Computer Architecture
Yihong Huang et al.Machine Learning
Nasib Ullah et al.Machine Learning
Alec Kirkley et al.Network Science
Quinn Dougherty et al.Software Engineering

Get your work graded

Your first review is free. Pay as you go or subscribe for additional features.